Universitätsklinikum Jena

Quality results

Treatment sector: Living liver donation (TX-LLS)

Information about this treatment area (documentation)

Designation	Leberlebendspende
Shortcut	LLS
Number of cases	10
Documentation rate	100 %

Summary result:

In 2 of 2 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
No assessment is possible for one quality characteristic

Number of patients treated: 10

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Show national result

Quality criterion

Hospital result
and target area

Quality objective
achieved?

All information

This is how rarely living liver donors experienced complications during or after transplantation that had to be treated

Hospital: 0,00 %

Sentinel Event

Assessment not possible

Click here

This is how rarely organ donors die during their hospital stay

Hospital: 0,00 %

Sentinel Event

Quality objective achieved

Click here

This is how rarely a liver transplant was necessary for the donor after donation

Hospital: 0,00 %

Sentinel Event

Quality objective achieved

Click here

Code ID	2128
Result (%)	0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue	An assessment is not possible because the examination procedure to clarify the deviation from the target area has not yet been completed. (S92)
Population
Events observed
Anticipated events	0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year	eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)	7,32
Target range (reference range)	Sentinel Event
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	2,52 - 19,43
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.

Code ID	2125
Result (%)	0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	10
Events observed	0
Anticipated events	0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	0,00
Target range (reference range)	Sentinel Event
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	0,00 - 8,57
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 27,75
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.

Code ID	2127
Result (%)	0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	10
Events observed	0
Anticipated events	0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	0,00
Target range (reference range)	Sentinel Event
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	0,00 - 8,57
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 27,75
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.